@Misc{FigueiredoCLLGPMT:2022:InVeRe,
author = "Figueiredo, Jo{\~a}o Batista Ara{\'u}jo and Chou, Sin Chan and
Lyra, Andr{\'e} de Arruda and Latinovic, Dragan and Gomes, Jorge
Lu{\'{\i}}s and Paolicchi, Lu{\'{\i}}s Thiago Lucci
Corr{\^e}a and Medeiros, Gustavo Sueiro and Tavares, Priscila da
Silva",
title = "Influence of vertical resolution and convection parametrizations
on the Global ETA Framework model (GEF) simulations",
year = "2022",
date = "26-30 set. 2022",
howpublished = "INPE",
keywords = "GEF, Vertical resolution, Convective parameterization.",
targetfile = "TP05A1_FigueiredoJ.pdf",
abstract = "This work goals to study the influence of vertical resolution and
convection parameterization schemes on the performance of the
Global Eta Framework (GEF) model. The GEF model is based on the
Eta regional model. The work seeks to better represent the
stratosphere in the model and, consequently, improve predictions.
The Betts-Miller-Janjic (BMJ) and Kain-Fritsch (KF) convective
parameterizations were evaluated. The model was configured in a
horizontal resolution of 25 km, with vertical resolutions of 50
and 70 levels, and top in 1 hPa. The model was integrated daily
for the month of January 2018, using the initial conditions of the
Global Forecast System model (GFS) of 00Z. The simulation period
was 10 days. The fifth and ninth day of the simulations were
evaluated, using observational data from ERA5 reanalysis and NOAA
CPC Morphing Technique (CMORPH) precipitation. The precipitation
simulations showed that the increase in vertical resolution
resulted in a slight improvement in the KF scheme, however the BMJ
experiment with 50 levels showed the best performance. In
comparison with the ERA5 reanalysis, the temperature at 5 hPa is
best represented with 70 vertical levels, by the two convective
schemes. The large-scale patterns of pressure at mean sea level,
temperature at 2 meters and at 850 hPa are reproduced by the
experiments, however, the regions of higher latitudes showed the
greatest differences compared with reanalysis. In general, the
results showed that the GEF model performed better in the
configuration with 50 vertical levels and with the BMJ convective
scheme for precipitation, pressure and flow in 250 hPa. However,
the configuration with 70 levels resulted in an improvement in
temperature in 250 hPa and 5 hPa and also in the flow in 5 hPa, in
both convective schemes. The simulations also reproduced the mean
vertical structure of the temperature and the zonal component (u)
well, especially in the lower atmosphere. Thus, this study
contributes to the development and improvement of the performance
of the GEF model.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGP3W34T/47MGK52",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP3W34T/47MGK52",
urlaccessdate = "03 maio 2024"
}